Pollitzer v. Gebhardt’s Empirical Analysis
860 F.3d 1334 · 2017
Citation profile
2 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 105 · 11 U.S.C. § 1208 · 11 U.S.C. § 1307 · 11 U.S.C. § 707
Relies on Lorillard v. Pons · Toibb v. Radloff · Mayo Foundation for Medical Education & Research v. United States · Hamilton v. Lanning · Ransom v. FIA Card Services, N. A.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In determining whether a statute is plain or ambiguous, we consider 'the language itself, the specific context in which that language is used, and the broader context of the statute as a whole.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Interpretations of the [Bankruptcy] Code are questions of law that we review de novo .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.