United States v. Wolf’s Empirical Analysis
860 F.3d 175 · 2017
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1343 · 18 U.S.C. § 1344 · 18 U.S.C. § 1956 (§ 1352 of the Money Laundering Control Act of 1986) · 18 U.S.C. § 1962 (§ 901 of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 3553
Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · Giglio v. United States · United States v. Lighty · United States v. Llamas · United States of America v. Akin Akinkoye a
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“evidence that a reasonable finder of fact could accept as adequate and sufficient to support a conclusion of a defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. U.S. v. Farrell“With regard to the district court's Brady ruling, we apply de novo review to its legal determinations and clear error review to its factual findings.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“the district court's denial of a motion for acquittal based on sufficiency of the evidence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. U.S. v. Farrell
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.