Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

860 N.E.2d 570

In re Johnson

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided January 22, 2007

Indiana Supreme Court · decided 2007-01-22

Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently April 2019 · most notably Rose Acre Farms, Inc. v. United States (2009), State v. Kimco of Evansville, Inc. (2009)

3 federal appellate · 28 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2007-01-22

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1ORDER GRANTING REINSTATEMENT

¶2On November 18, 2002, this Court suspended the petitioner, David Charles Johnson, for two (2) years without automatic reinstatement. Petitioner filed his petition for reinstatement on July 20, 2005. On November 6, 2006, the Indiana Supreme Court Disciplinary Commission, pursuant to Ind. Admission and Discipline Rule 23 § 18(b), filed its recommendation that the petitioner be reinstated to the practice of law in this state.

¶3And this Court, being duly advised, finds that the recommendation of the Commission should be followed and that, accordingly, the petitioner should be reinstated as a member of the bar of this state.

¶4IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the petition for reinstatement of the petitioner, David Charles Johnson, is hereby GRANTED. The petitioner is reinstated as a member of the bar of this state.

All Justices concur.
/860/ne2d/570 · .json · Public domain