Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 860 P2D 1101 - Mehring v. State

Mehring v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

67
cited by 67 later decisions
1
states following
February 2025
most recently cited

67 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 67 later decisions — most recently February 2025 · most notably Cargill, Inc. v. Mountain Cement Co. (1995), Doherty v. State (2006)

67 state decisions

3001993200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · North Carolina v. Alford · Hill v. Lockhart · Brady v. United States · Payne v. Tennessee

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 67 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “W.R.Cr.P. 32(a) specifically permits information about the prior criminal record of the defendant and his characteristics to be considered by the trial court before imposing sentence. In evaluating character, the trial court, in exercising its discretion, may consider a broad range of reports and information.”
    15 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “' "represents a voluntary and intelligent choice among the alternative courses of action open to the defendant.”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “The courts of our land do not function with scripts requiring each participant to perform his or her specific part in the same manner on each occasion. We should never mistake the presence of the printed or spoken word for comprehension. A ritualistic expression of verbiage, complete with legal terminology and excess, may provide a comfortable layer of support for technically demanding members of the bar, but would provide little real assurance that the accused actually understands what is about to be accomplished.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.