Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 860 P.2d 968 - State v. Hayes

State v. Hayes’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
June 2018
most recently cited

6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently June 2018

6 state decisions

30199320002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Rhode Island v. Innis · Uintah Oil Ass'n v. County Board of Equalization · State v. Archambeau · Crosland v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “any words or actions on the part of the police (other than those normally attendant to arrest and custody) that the police should know are reasonably likely to elicit an incriminating response from the suspect. The latter portion of this definition focuses primarily upon the perceptions of the suspect, rather than the intent of the police_But, since the police surely cannot be held accountable for the unforeseeable results of their words or actions, the definition of interrogation can extend only to words or actions on the part ’of police officers that they should have known were reasonably likely to elicit an incriminating response.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “In reviewing the trial court's denial of [Defendant's] motion to suppress, we examine the underlying factual findings for clear error, and review the trial court's conclusions of law based thereon for correctness.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[t]he jury is free to believe or disbelieve all or part of any witness's testimony,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.