Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 860 P.2d 988 - State v. Tinoco

State v. Tinoco’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
February 2018
most recently cited

5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently February 2018

5 state decisions

30199320002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Andrews · State v. Howell · State v. Archuleta · State v. Garrett · State v. Speer

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “However, [if] a jury instruction is erroneous, 'we will reverse only if the defendant shows a reasonable probability the error affected the outcome of his case.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “the evidence before the jury would have supported a conclusion that, while [Haston] did not intend or know his actions would cause death, firing a gun during a drunken quarrel was a reckless actl, and thus, it was possible Haston was convicted of a nonexistent crime.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Whether a trial court properly instructed the jury is a question of law, which we review for correctness.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.