860 So. 2d 457 - Luda v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
August 2011
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Waller v. Georgia · 414 So. 2d 509 - Williams v. State · 854 So. 2d 816 - Reyes v. State · 808 So. 2d 92 - Evans v. State · 827 So. 2d 269 - Alvarez v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A defendant, however, can waive his right to a public trial by failing to object. In the instant case, Luda's attorney generally objected to the closure. But, he did not request that Luda's family members be allowed to remain in the courtroom and did not draw the trial court's attention to the language of section 918.16, Florida Statutes (1998), that exempts the parties' immediate families from exclusion from the courtroom. An objection must be specific enough to apprise the trial judge of the putative error and to preserve the issue for intelligent review on appeal.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.