860 So. 2d 687 - Stack v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
30
cited by 30 later decisions
1
states following
June 2018
most recently cited
29 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · 503 So. 2d 803 - Wetz v. State · 451 So. 2d 743 - Neal v. State · 454 So. 2d 468 - Stringer v. State · 460 So. 2d 778 - May v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“show concrete facts that demonstrate the particular prejudice to the defense.”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage“(1) the pre-indictment delay prejudiced that defendant, and (2) the delay was an intentional device used by the government to obtain a tactical advantage over the accused.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“in a pre-indictment analysis of due process violations that the burden of persuasion is on the defendant.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.