860 So. 2d 930 - Conde v. State’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

69 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 70 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “Where an appellant claims he was wrongfully forced to exhaust his peremptory challenges because the trial court erroneously denied a cause challenge, both error and prejudice must be established.”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Kopsho v. State · 894 So. 2d 88 - Busby v. State

2. “was provided food, drink, access to restrooms, the opportunity to place phone calls, and at least eleven hours away from the detectives at a place where he could rest”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. 76 So. 3d 335 - White v. State · 919 So. 2d 347 - Perez v. State

3. “[A] trial court has great discretion when deciding whether a challenge for cause based on juror incompetency is proper.”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Suri v. State · James Guzman v. State of Florida