Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

860 S.W.2d 116

Ve Corp. v. Ernst Young

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 3, 1993

Court of Appeals of Texas · decided 1993-03-03

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently June 1993

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1993-03-03

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1OPINION AND JUDGMENT ON DISMISSAL OF APPEAL

ASHWORTH, Justice (Retired, Sitting by Assignment).

¶2On this day came on to be considered by the Court the motion of appellee, Ernst & Young, to dismiss appeal. The Court finds that prior to the submission of this cause on December 2, 1992, the appellant, on December 1, 1992, filed an identical suit in the Santa Clara County Superior Court, San Jose, California. Such filing rendered moot the cause before us. Such filing was not made known to this Court at time of submission. It is therefore this Court’s opinion that appellee’s motion to dismiss should be granted.

¶3It is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed that our opinion and judgment of January 26, 1998 is withdrawn and this appeal is dismissed.

¶4Appellee’s motion for rehearing is overruled.

¶5It is further ordered that appellant, VE Corp., pay all costs of this appeal, and that said costs be paid from the cash deposit made with the clerk of the trial court, for which let execution issue, and that this decision be certified below for observance.

/860/sw2d/116 · .json · Public domain