Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 861 A.2d 1029 - State v. Snell

State v. Snell’s Empirical Analysis

2004

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
January 2012
most recently cited

7 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Bourdeau · State v. Grant · State v. Vashey · State v. Crudup · State v. Feole

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The hearing justice is not required to determine beyond a reasonable doubt whether a crime was committed, rather only whether 'there is reasonably satisfactory evidence to prove that a violation occurred.’ ”). 3 . The applicant's original application additionally alleged that he has suffered cruel and unusual punishment at the Adult Correctional Institutions; but applicant withdrew that allegation during his postconviction relief hearing, and the issue is therefore not before us. 4 . The applicant also raises a number of issues for the first time on appeal, which are barred by this Court’s”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.