McEntee v. Davis’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
12 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently February 2025
12 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Diman v. the Providence, Warren, and Bristol R.R. Company · Harris v. Town of Lincoln · Lisi v. Marra · Vanderford v. Kettelle · Hopkins v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“conclude that the trial justice committed reversible error in making a factual determination of unilateral mistake”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“unless the decision fails to do substantial justice between the parties.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“unless the trial justice misconceived or overlooked material evidence[,]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.