← 861 F.2d 1124 - Mesa Verde Construction Co. v. Northern California District Council of Laborers

Mesa Verde Construction Co. v. Northern California District Council of Laborers’s Empirical Analysis

861 F.2d 1124 · 1988

Citation profile

131

cited by 131 later decisions

May 2016

most recently cited

100 federal appellate · 2 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 131 later decisions — most recently May 2016 · most notably Miller v. Gammie (2003), Elian Gonzalez v. Janet Reno (2000)

100 federal appellate · 2 district ·

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 16 U.S.C. § 1247 · 16 U.S.C. § 825 (§ 301 of the Federal Power Act of 1920) · 21 U.S.C. § 346 (Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act) · 29 U.S.C. § 157 (§ 7 of the National Labor Relations Act) · 29 U.S.C. § 158 (§ 8 of the National Labor Relations Act) · 29 U.S.C. § 159 (§ 9 of the National Labor Relations Act) · 29 U.S.C. § 160 (§ 10 of the National Labor Relations Act) · 29 U.S.C. § 185 (§ 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act of 1947 (Taft-Hartley Act))

Relies on Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Cardoza-Fonseca · Chevron Oil Co. v. Huson · William Marbury v. James Madison · United States v. American Trucking Associations

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 131 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

“pre-hire agreement[ ] may not be unilaterally repudiated by either a union or an employer prior to its termination or absent an election among the appropriate bargaining unit's employees to reject the union.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
e.g. Laborer's Health and Welfare Fund for Southern California v. Meekins Inc · Vier Construction Company Inc v. Local Union of the International Union of Operating Engineers
“if prior decisions of this court constitute only deferential review of NLRB interpretations of labor law, and do not decide that a particular interpretation of statute is the only reasonable interpretation... subsequent panels of this court are free to adopt new and reasonable NLRB decisions without the requirement of en banc review.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
e.g. TCI West, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board · Southern California Painters & Allied Trade District Council No. 36 v. Best Interiors, Inc.
“We have concluded that the Board's construction of the Act, although perhaps not the only tenable one, is an acceptable reading of the statutory language and a reasonable implementation of the purposes of the relevant statutory sections.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
e.g. National Labor Relations Board v. Bufco Corp. · National Labor Relations Board v. W.L. Miller Co.

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.