Oltz v. St. Peter's Community Hospital’s Empirical Analysis
861 F.2d 1440 · 1988
Citation profile
87 federal appellate · 11 district · 11 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 175 later decisions — most recently May 2020 · most notably Orr v. Bank of America, NT & SA (2002), Bhan v. NME Hospitals, Inc. (1991)
87 federal appellate · 11 district · 11 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 1 (§ 1 of the Sherman Antitrust Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 1292
Relies on Brunswick Corporation v. Pueblo Bowl-O-Mat Inc · Vandygriff v. Phillips · Hannahville Indian Community v. United States · United States v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co. · Monsanto Company v. Spray-Rite Service Corporation
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 175 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The product market includes the pool of goods or services that enjoy reasonable interchangeability of use and cross-elasticity of demand.”
9 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Proving injury to competition in a rule of reason case almost uniformly requires a claimant to prove the relevant market and to show the effects of competition within that market.”
8 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. 1998-1 Trade Cases P 72,122, 98 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2752, 98 Daily Journal D.A.R. 3799 Adaptive Power Solutions, Llc, a California Limited Liability Corporation, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellant v. Hughes Missile Systems Company, a Delaware Corporation Raytheon Company, a Delaware Corporation, Defendant-Counter-Claimant-Appellee · Big Bear Lodging Association v. Snow Summit, Inc.“(1) an agreement or conspiracy among two or more persons or distinct business entities; (2) by which the persons or entities intend to harm or restrain competition; and (3) which actually injures competition.”
7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Les Shockley Racing, Inc. Les Shockley Robert W. Correll Gary G. Cerveny Douglas J. Malewicki Aero-Visions, Inc. Gary M. Krolczyk Larry C. Parks Dorothy M. McClure v. National Hot Rod Association K & K Insurance Agency, Inc., Les Shockley Racing, Inc. Les Shockley Robert W. Correll Gary G. Cerveny Douglas J. Malewicki Aero-Visions, Inc. Gary M. Krolczyk Larry C. Parks Dorothy M. McClure v. National Hot Rod Association, and K & K Insurance Agency, Inc. · 1996-2 Trade Cases P 71,501, 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5506, 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 9028 American Ad Management, Inc. O'COnnOr Agency v. Gte Corp., and General Telephone Company of California Gte Directories Publishing Corp. Gte Directories Service Corp. Gte National Marketing Service Corp. Gte Directories Sales Corp.
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.