Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

861 F.2d 266

Docket No. 88-6660.

Strader v. Hl Bridges

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted Aug. 16, 1988. Decided Sept. 22, 1988.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on United States v. Llewellyn Tucker Flippen

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently May 2013

1 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

301988199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Carroll Eugene Strader, appellant pro se.

Barry Steven McNeill, Office of Attorney General of North Carolina, for appellees.

Before DONALD RUSSELL and CHAPMAN, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Carroll Eugene Strader appeals from the district court's order refusing habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause and dismiss this appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Strader v. Bridges, CA-87-842-C-S (M.D.N.C. May 13, 1988). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶2

DISMISSED.

/861/f2d/266 · .json · Public domain