Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

861 F.2d 267

Docket No. 87-7716.

West v. Schupple

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted: Sept. 16, 1988. Decided: Oct. 7, 1988.

This page is marked noindex.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1988-10-07

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently August 2002

1 federal appellate ·

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Wilder v. Chairman Central Classification Board

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1988-10-07

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

John West, appellant pro se.

Karen Stakem Hornig, Mark Disbrow McCurdy (Office of the Attorney General of Maryland), for appellees.

Before DONALD RUSSELL, JAMES DICKSON PHILLIPS and ERVIN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

John West appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. West v. Schupple, C/A No. 85-928-HM (D.Md. Sept. 2, 1987). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶2

AFFIRMED.

/861/f2d/267 · .json · Public domain