Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

861 F.2d 714

Docket Nos. 88-6724 - 88-6733

Abdullah (Saleem Nuriddin) v. Weant (Edward O., Jr., Hon.)

Full caption · 10 consolidated cases

  • Saleem Nuriddin ABDULLAHv.Benjamin LOVE, Esquire, Assistant State's Attorney for Carroll County
  • Saleem Nuriddin ABDULLAHv.Ralph T. UEBERSAX, Esquire, Deputy State's Attorney for Carroll County
  • Saleem Nuriddin ABDULLAHv.Charles W. THOMPSON, JR., Esquire, Assistant State's Attorney for Carroll County
  • Saleem Nuriddin ABDULLAHv.Thomas E. HICHMAN, Esquire, State's Attorney for Carroll County, Defendant-
  • Saleem Nuriddin ABDULLAHv.STATE OF MARYLAND
  • Saleem Nuriddin ABDULLAHv.The Honorable Edward O. WEANT, Jr., Chief Judge, Fifth Judicial Circuit Court for the County of Carroll
  • Saleem Nuriddin ABDULLAHv.Dr. Julius CHEPKO
  • Saleem Nuriddin ABDULLAHv.Glenn E. MUMMERT, Warden, Carroll County Detention Center
  • Saleem Nuriddin ABDULLAHv.H. Leroy CAMPBELL, Sheriff of Carroll County (1975-1977), Carroll County Sheriff's Department
  • Saleem Nuriddin ABDULLAHv.J. Robert JOHNSON, Esquire, Attorney at Law, Assistant District Public Defender for Carroll County

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted Aug. 25, 1988. Decided Oct. 3, 1988.

This page is marked noindex.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Cited by 36 later decisions — most recently June 1989 · most notably Head v. North Carolina Department of Justice, Jesse R. Lance v. South Carolina Highway Patrolmen, Lafon Bethea, William A. Jackson, Ronald N. Alford, Jesse R. Lance v. South Carolina Highway Patrolmen, Lafon Bethea, William A. Jackson, Renale Oxford (1988)

36 federal appellate ·

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam ·

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Saleem Nuriddin Abdullah, appellant pro se.

Before DONALD RUSSELL and JAMES DICKSON PHILLIPS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Saleem Nuriddin Abdullah, a Maryland prisoner, appeals the district court's dismissal of ten of his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 actions. The dismissals were entered on February 24, 1988. Abdullah's notices of appeal are dated March 14, 1988, but they were not received by the district court until June 17, 1988, nearly three months after the after the expiration of 30-day appeal period established by Fed.R.App.P. 4(a)(1).

¶2

In Houston v. Lack, 56 U.S.L.W. 4728 (U.S. June 24, 1988) (No. 87-5428), the Supreme Court held that a prisoner's notice of appeal is filed when he delivers it to prison officials for forwarding to the district court. We cannot determine from the records before us whether Abdullah gave his notice of appeal to the prison authorities and, if he did, when he gave it to the prison authorities for forwarding to the district court. Accordingly, we remand the cases to the district court. On remand, that court will obtain this information, making any necessary evidentiary rulings. The cases, as supplemented, then will be returned to this Court for further consideration.

¶3

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal arguments are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and oral argument would not significantly aid the decisional process.

¶4

REMANDED.

/861/f2d/714 · .json · Public domain