Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

861 F.2d 719

Docket Nos. 87-1496, 87-1516.

Boyd v. United States

This page is marked noindex.

Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1988-11-07

Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently September 1999

17 federal appellate · 1 district ·

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1988-11-07

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.

Before KRUPANSKY and RALPH B. GUY, Jr., Circuit Judges, and RONALD E. MEREDITH, District Judge.*

PER CURIAM.

¶1

Upon consideration of the briefs, oral arguments, and existing legal precedent, this court is of the opinion that appellant's assignments of error are not well-taken. Accordingly, for the reasons stated in the magistrate's report on the equal protection issue as incorporated in the district court's opinion and for the reasons expressed in the district court's opinions on the theft loss, profit motive, negligence penalty, and trial misconduct issues, the decisions below are AFFIRMED.

*

Hon. Ronald E. Meredith, United States District Judge for the Western District of Kentucky, sitting by designation

/861/f2d/719 · .json · Public domain