United States v. Ugalde’s Empirical Analysis
861 F.2d 802 · 1988
Citation profile
62 federal appellate · 2 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 75 later decisions — most recently July 2019 · most notably United States v. Calderon (1997), United States v. Seago (1991)
62 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Brady v. State of Maryland · William Marbury v. James Madison · Gregory Lumber Co. v. United States · Federal Energy Regulatory Commission v. Martin Exploration Management Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 75 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]here are 'rare cases where the record is sufficiently complete'”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“We must ensure that for every right there is a remedy.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“an unusually stringent substantive test,”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.