Yali Wang v. Sessions’s Empirical Analysis
861 F.3d 1003 · 2017
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (§ 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1158 (§ 208 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (§ 242 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Elias-Zacarias · Farah v. Ashcroft · Shrestha v. Holder · Rizk v. Holder · Ren v. Holder
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“We review 'denials of asylum, withholding of removal, and CAT relief for substantial evidence and will uphold a denial supported by reasonable, substantial, and probative evidence on the record considered as a whole.' " Yali Wang , 861 F.3d at 1007 (quoting Ling Huang v. Holder , 744 F.3d 1149 , 1152 (9th Cir. 2014) ). "We may reverse the decision of the [BIA] only if the applicant shows that the evidence compels the conclusion that the asylum decision was incorrect.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“) denial of his claims for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 to review final orders of removal.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.