Marroquín-Rivera v. Sessions’s Empirical Analysis
861 F.3d 7 · 2017
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1182 (§ 212 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1231 (§ 241 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Lopez Perez v. Holder · Larios v. Holder · Ordonez-Quino v. Holder
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“he[r] life or freedom would be threatened”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“there as a criminal deportee, and we begin with his challenge to the denial of that aspect of his CAT claim. Bonnet advances numerous arguments in support of this challenge,2 but the necessary premise for each of them is the same: that the IJ erred in finding -- or, at the least, that the BIA erred in affirming the IJ's finding -- that Bonnet had failed to show that it was more likely than not that he would be”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“under the 'substantial evidence' standard to determine if those findings are 'supported by reasonable, substantial, and probative evidence on the record considered as a whole.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.