Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

861 So. 2d 1087

Coleman v. Higginbotham

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided April 25, 2003

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · decided 2003-04-25

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently December 2017

3 state decisions

Relies on Ex Parte Coleman

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2003-04-25

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1After Remand from the Alabama Supreme Court

PITTMAN, Judge.

¶2This court, on December 7, 2001, affirmed the trial court’s judgment, without an opinion. The Alabama Supreme Court has affirmed this court’s judgment insofar as it relates to the Colemans’ fraud and tort-of-outrage claims and has reversed this court’s judgment insofar as it relates to the Coleman’s breach-of-contract and conversion claims, and has remanded the cause. Ex parte Coleman, 861 So.2d 1080 (Ala.2003). In compliance with the Alabama Supreme Court’s opinion, that portion of the trial court’s judgment relating to the Colemans’ breach-of-contract and conversion claims is reversed, and the cause is remanded for further proceedings consistent with the Supreme Court’s opinion.

¶3REVERSED IN PART AND REMANDED.

YATES, P.J., and CRAWLEY, THOMPSON, and MURDOCK, JJ., concur.
/861/so2d/1087 · .json · Public domain