Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 861 SO2D 1195 - State v. Richman

State v. Richman’s Empirical Analysis

2003

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
October 2010
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 110 So. 2d 654 - Williams v. State · People v. Haston · 658 So. 2d 523 - Haines City Community Dev. v. Heggs · 829 So. 2d 901 - Swett v. State · 520 So. 2d 250 - State v. Pettis

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he strict test set forth in Kulling is not appropriately applied ... where the identity of the defendant is not at issue. The rationale for requiring a heightened level of similarity in cases where the defendant is identified as the perpetrator based on collateral crimes involving the same modus operandi used in the charged offense is simply not applicable where the similar acts evidence is offered to corroborate the victim’s testimony that an offense occurred and to rebut the defendant’s contention that the victim’s testimony is fabricated.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.