Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 861 SO2D 462 - Perry v. State

Perry v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2003

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
May 2009
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 608 So. 2d 912 - Hierro v. State · 740 So. 2d 89 - Taylor v. State · 639 So. 2d 609 - State v. Anderson · 616 So. 2d 170 - Nesmith v. State · Perry v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “843.01 Resisting officer with violence to his or her person.—Whoever knowingly and willfully resists, obstructs, or opposes any officer as defined in s. 943.10(1), (2), (3), (6), (7), (8), or (9); member of the Parole Commission or any administrative aide or supervisor employed by the commission; parole and probation supervisor; county probation officer; personnel or representative of the Department of Law Enforcement; or other person legally authorized to execute process in the execution of legal process or in the lawful execution of any legal duty, by offering or doing violence to the person of such officer or legally authorized person, is guilty of a felony of the third degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “1. The defendant knowingly and willfully resisted, obstructed, and/or opposed an officer by offering to do violence or doing violence to the officer; 2. At the time the officer was engaged in the execution of legal process or lawful execution of a legal duty; and 3. At the time the officer was an officer as defined by statute.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.