Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 861 SO2D 586 - Kaufman v. Cleaton

Kaufman v. Cleaton’s Empirical Analysis

2003

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
October 2013
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 755 So. 2d 226 - Independent Fire Ins. Co. v. Sunbeam Corp. · Equipment, Inc. v. Anderson Petroleum, Inc. · Caston v. Centers for Psychotherapy, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The “Verifying Affidavit” filed by the defendant making the generalized assertion that “all of the allegations contained in her Answer and in her ‘Memorandum in Opposition to Beatrice Kaufman’s Motion for Summary Judgment’ are true and correct to the |sbest of her information, knowledge, and belief,” is not sufficient to meet the La. C.C.P. art. 967 requirements that summary judgment affidavits “set forth specific facts.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.