Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

862 F.2d 1107

Docket No. 88-3154.

Del v. Edwards

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Dec. 19, 1988.

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently March 1992

3 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

3 counsel of record

Relies on Del v. Edwards

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1988-12-19

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Arthur A. Lemann, III, Lemann, O'Hara, Miles & White, David A. Dalia, Asst. Atty. Gen., William A. Guste, Jr., Atty. Gen., Dept. of Justice, Emile W. Schneider, Mary Beck Widmann, Section Chief, Office of Gen. Counsel, New Orleans, La., for defendants-appellants.

Steven Scheckman, New Orleans Legal Assistance Corp., Ann McLaine, Mark A. Moreau, New Orleans, La., for plaintiffs-appellees.

Christopher T. Dunn, ACLU, Christopher A. Hansen, Marcia Robinson Lowry, New York City, for ACLU.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana, Morey L. Sear, District Judge, Presiding.

Before CLARK, Chief Judge, GEE, RUBIN, REAVLEY, POLITZ, KING, JOHNSON, WILLIAMS, GARWOOD, JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, JONES, SMITH, and DUHE, Circuit Judges.

¶1

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

¶2

(Opinion September 28, 1988, 5 Cir., 1988, 855 F.2d 1148)

BY THE COURT:

¶3

A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

¶4

IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the Court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.

/862/f2d/1107 · .json · Public domain