White v. Carlucci’s Empirical Analysis
862 F.2d 1209 · 1989
Citation profile
31 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 89 later decisions — most recently June 2023 · most notably Test Masters Educational Services, Inc. v. Singh (2005), Lakedreams v. Taylor (1991)
31 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 717 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 706 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)
Relies on Sampson v. Murray · Holland America Insurance v. Succession of Roy · Wilson v. Thompson · Apple Barrel Productions, Inc. v. Beard · 2 Fair empl.prac.cas. 67, 2 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 10,061 United States of America, by John N. Mitchell, Attorney General v. Hayes International Corporation
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 89 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“an extraordinary and drastic remedy, not to be granted routinely, but only when the movant, by a clear showing, carries the burden of persuasion.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“we will only review the district court's injunction decision 'when the record is exceptionally clear and remand would serve no useful purpose.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“To obtain a preliminary injunction, a movant has the burden of proving . . . a substantial likelihood of success on the merits[.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.