Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 862 F.2d 143 - United States v. McCarty

United States v. McCarty’s Empirical Analysis

862 F.2d 143 · 1988

Citation profile

43
cited by 43 later decisions
1
states following
February 2012
most recently cited

34 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 43 later decisions — most recently February 2012 · most notably United States v. Trigg (1989), United States v. Alfonso (1998)

34 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

2501988199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1951 (Hobbs Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 922 (Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act)

Relies on Illinois v. Gates · Brinegar v. United States · United States v. Ross · New York v. Belton · Michigan v. Long

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 43 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'fairly informs the defendant of the charges against him so that he may prepare a defense....'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “reinforced the reasonableness of the officers' belief that [the driver] had committed or was committing a crime.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.