Frigard v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
862 F.2d 201 · 1988
Citation profile
17 federal appellate · 3 district · 4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 54 later decisions — most recently October 2023 · most notably Doe v. United States (1995), Qualls v. Blue Cross Of California (1994)
17 federal appellate · 3 district · 4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1346 (Federal Tort Claims Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 2680
Relies on Dalehite v. United States · Berkovitz v. United States · United States v. S.A. Empresa De Viacao Aerea Rio Grandense · Town of Mashpee v. Mashpee Tribe · United States v. Neustadt
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 54 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Ordinarily, a case dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction should be dismissed without prejudice so that a plaintiff may reassert his claims in a competent court.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“The Frigards could reframe their claims to exclude the misinformation and reliance elements, and thereby avoid the bar of the misrepresentation exception. See, Block v. Neil, 460 U.S. 289, 297-98 , 103 S.Ct. 1089, 1093-94 , 75 L.Ed.2d 67 (1983). However, we would also lack jurisdiction to hear such an action for simple mismanagement or negligent supervision under another exception to the Federal Tort Claims Act____”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“claims arising from commercial decisions based on false or inadequate information provided by the government”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.