Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 862 F.2d 471 - Harrell v. Bowen

Harrell v. Bowen’s Empirical Analysis

862 F.2d 471 · 1988

Citation profile

98
cited by 98 later decisions
July 2018
most recently cited

7 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 98 later decisions — most recently July 2018 · most notably Villa v. Sullivan (1990), Selders v. Sullivan (1990)

7 federal appellate · 1 district ·

4001988199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1381 (§ 1601 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 405 (§ 205 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 421 (§ 221 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 423 (§ 223 of the Social Security Act of 1935)

Relies on Heckler v. Campbell · Hames v. Heckler · Reeves v. Heckler · Stone v. Heckler · Fraga v. Bowen

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 98 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) a claimant who is working, engaging in a substantial gainful activity, will not be found to be disabled no matter what the medical findings are; (2) a claimant will not be found to be disabled unless he has a “severe impairment”; (3) a claimant whose impairment meets or is equivalent to an impairment listed in Appendix 1 of the regulations will be considered disabled without the need to consider vocational factors; (4) a claimant who is capable of performing work that he has done in the past must be found “not disabled”; and (5) if the claimant is unable to perform his previous work as a result of his impairment, then factors such as his age, education, past work experience, and residual functional capacity must be considered to determine whether he can do other work.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “to engage in any substantial gainful activity by reason of [a] medically determinable physical or mental impairment ... which has lasted or can be expected to last for a continuous period of not less than 12 months.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “constant, unremitting, and wholly unresponsive to therapeutic treatment.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.