Day v. Union Mines Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
862 F.2d 652 · 1988
Citation profile
9 federal appellate · 4 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 54 later decisions — most recently January 2022 · most notably LaDuke v. Burlington Northern Railroad (1989), Niagara Mohawk Power Corp. v. Hudson River-Black River Regulating District (2012)
9 federal appellate · 4 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1441 · 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Relies on Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp. · Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United States · Brillhart v. Excess Insurance Co. of America · Will v. Calvert Fire Insurance · Arizona v. San Carlos Apache Tribe of Ariz.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 54 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a finding that the concurrent proceedings are 'parallel.' " Dittmer v. Cty. of Suffolk , 146 F.3d 113 , 117-18 (2d Cir.1998). "Suits are parallel when substantially the same parties are contemporaneously litigating substantially the same issue in another forum.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“[w]here the validity, enforceability and interpretation of a contract are at issue in both federal and state courts, and the state litigation was commenced first and has progressed substantially towards completion, entry of a stay does not under Colorado River constitute an abuse of discretion.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Aar v. Sa Sa Sa“Part of the rationale behind our decision in Microsoftware to uphold the Colorado River stay was that the federal plaintiff, MCS, had passed up an opportunity to be heard in federal court.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.