Matek’s Empirical Analysis
Citation profile
7 federal appellate · 2 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently July 2020 · most notably Lashawn A. v. Barry (1996), In re Merrimack Mutual Fire Insurance (1978)
7 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United Mine Workers of America v. Gibbs · Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp. · Bell v. Hood · Vandygriff v. Phillips · Hannahville Indian Community v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[s]ubject matter jurisdiction, because of its intrinsic importance to the judicial power of the federal courts, is particularly suitable for reconsideration.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“[t]he proper focus must be the partnership agreement and not how in fact the entity functioned in carrying out its business affairs.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“access to information about the investment, and not managerial control, is the most significant factor”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.