United States v. Doe’s Empirical Analysis
862 F.2d 776 · 1988
Citation profile
38 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 49 later decisions — most recently July 2012 · most notably United States v. Baker (1993), United States of America v. Jose Lombera-Camorlinga (2000)
38 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 5031 · 18 U.S.C. § 5032 · 18 U.S.C. § 5033 · 28 U.S.C. § 1291
Relies on Gault · Vandygriff v. Phillips · Hannahville Indian Community v. United States · United States v. McConney · Bank of Nova Scotia v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 49 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“statutory claim based on the speedy arraignment provision presents a mixed question of law and fact for which de novo review is appropriate.”
7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[i]f the statutory violations did not rise to the level of constitutional violations but nonetheless prejudiced”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“was the violation harmless to the juvenile beyond a reasonable doubt?”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.