Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 862 F.3d 1265 - United States v. Wright

United States v. Wright’s Empirical Analysis

862 F.3d 1265 · 2017

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
July 2024
most recently cited

5 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1028A · 18 U.S.C. § 1029 · 18 U.S.C. § 1349 (§ 902 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002) · 18 U.S.C. § 3553

Relies on Knowles v. Iowa · United States v. Rodriguez De Varon · United States v. Scroggins · United States v. Barrington · United States v. Murrell

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “any card, plate, code, account number, electronic serial number, mobile identification number, personal identification number, or other telecommunications service, equipment, or instrument identifier, or other means of account access that can be used, alone or in conjunction with another access device, to obtain money, goods, services, or any other thing of value, or that can be used to initiate a transfer of funds (other than a transfer originated solely by paper instrument).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “In determining whether [the] adjustment applies, the district court should consider, first, the defendant's role in the relevant conduct for which he has been held accountable at sentencing, and, second, his role as compared to that of other participants in his relevant conduct.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “any sentence previously imposed upon adjudication of guilt, whether by guilty plea, trial, or plea of nolo contendere .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.