Hamilton v. Bromley’s Empirical Analysis
862 F.3d 329 · 2017
Citation profile
2 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Relies on Younger v. Harris · Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better Environment · Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United States · O'Shea v. Littleton · Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he capable-of-repetition doctrine is a narrow exception that 'applies only in exceptional situations' where '(1) the challenged action is in its duration too short to be fully litigated prior to cessation or expiration, and (2) there is a reasonable expectation that the same complaining party will be subject to the same action again.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“(1) state criminal prosecutions; (2) civil enforcement proceedings; and (3) civil proceedings involving certain orders that are uniquely in furtherance of the state courts' ability to perform their judicial functions.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.