United States v. Schock’s Empirical Analysis
862 F.3d 563 · 2017
Citation profile
2 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2242 · 18 U.S.C. § 2251 (Child Pornography Prevention Act of 1996) · 18 U.S.C. § 2252A (§ 101 of the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996)
Relies on Gall v. United States · Molina-Martinez v. United States · United States v. Villano · United States v. Schultz · United States v. Penson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“offenses of a character for which § 3D1.2(d) would require grouping of multiple counts.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“The district court's interpretation of the Guidelines and mixed questions of law and fact are reviewed de novo [,] while factual findings are reviewed for clear error.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“all acts and omissions . . . that were part of the same course of conduct or common scheme or plan as the offense of conviction.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.