Grant v. Swarthout’s Empirical Analysis
862 F.3d 914 · 2017
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1915 · 28 U.S.C. § 2244 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Pace v. Superintendent State Correctional Institution at Graterford · Carey Warden v. Saffold · Holland v. Florida · Holland v. Florida · Oscar Socop-Gonzalez v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“would give judges a 'legislation-overriding' role that is beyond the Judiciary's power.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“attempt[ed] to resolve the impediment preventing timely filing.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Torres v. McDowell
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.