Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 862 F. Supp. 1421 - Doe v. Shalala

862 F. Supp. 1421 - Doe v. Shalala’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
February 2019
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 3 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently February 2019

1 federal appellate · 3 district ·

30199420002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 281 (Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act of 2009) · 42 U.S.C. § 289 · 42 U.S.C. § 289A · 42 U.S.C. § 289A

Relies on Warth v. Seldin · Baker v. Carr · Roe v. Wade · Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc. · Allen v. Wright

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “to prevent the Panel from holding any meetings or making any recommendations to NIH or the Secretary of Health and Human Services with regard to the issue of human fetal research.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “will have the effect of making socially acceptable, and ultimately fully legal, the destruction of people affected with Down's syndrome.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.