Prough v. Edinger, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
21 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently June 2024
21 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Conley v. Gibson · Foman v. Davis · Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc. · Williams v. United States · 418 F. Supp. 435 - American Electric Power Co. v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'outright refusal to grant leave [to amend] without any justifying reason appearing for the denial' is an abuse of discretion, ... there is no abuse if the court relies on a reason such as 'undue delay, bad faith or dilatory motive on the part of the movant, repeated failure to cure deficiencies by amendments previously allowed, undue prejudice to the opposing party ... [or] futility of amendment.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage“The Oklahoma Pleading Code is based on the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and we may look to federal authority for guidance in applying its provisions.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage“the trial court has always possessed discretion over whether to allow an amendment to a pleading,”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.