Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 862 P.2d 89 - Ransom v. Ransom

Ransom v. Ransom’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
October 1998
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Chamberlin v. Chamberlin · Eckel v. Adair · LeFlore v. Reflections of Tulsa, Inc. · Hester v. Hester · Phillips v. Phillips

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The provisions of subsections C and D of this section shall have retrospective and prospective application with regards to modifications of the provisions of a final judgment or order for alimony as support, or of a divorce decree pertaining to the payment of alimony as support, regardless of the date that the order, judgment, or decree was entered.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.