862 So. 2d 129 - State v. LeBlanc’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
October 2012
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Manson v. Brathwaite · Arizona v. Youngblood · 523 So. 2d 1305 - State v. Mussall · 446 So. 2d 729 - State v. Prudholm
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Specific criminal intent is "that state of mind that exists when the circumstances indicate that the offender actively desired the prescribed criminal consequences to follow his act or failure to act." La. R.S. 14:10(1). The determination of specific criminal intent is a question of fact. State v. Seals, 95-0305 (La.11/25/96), 684 So.2d 368, 373 , cert. denied, Seals v. Louisiana, 520 U.S. 1199 , 117 S.Ct. 1558 , 137 L.Ed.2d 705 (1997). Specific intent may be inferred from the circumstances and the actions of the defendant. Seals, 684 So.2d at 373 .”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“the killing of a human being ... [w]hen the offender has a specific intent to kill or to inflict great bodily harm.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.