862 So. 2d 44 - Barrett v. State’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

4 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “). Because the Parties have not fully briefed the issue of whether Count V-a due process claim under Article I, Section 9 of the Florida Constitution -can proceed, Defendant's motion to dismiss Count V is granted and Count V is dismissed without prejudice. F. The Federal Government is Not an Indispensable Party Rule 19 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires that, under certain circumstances, a person must be joined as a party in an action. Fed. R. Civ. P. 19(a). Specifically, a party must be joined if”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 349 F. Supp. 3d 1236 - C.F.C. v. Miami-Dade Cnty.

2. “there is no basis to conclude that the Florida Constitution provides greater protections to Barrett than does the United States Constitution in relation to the elimination of voluntary intoxication as a defense to a criminal offense.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Troy v. State

3. “right to have a jury consider evidence of his voluntary intoxication in determining whether he possesses the requisite mental state is a `fundamental principle of justice.'”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Troy v. State