Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 862 So. 2d 576 - Sharp v. State

862 So. 2d 576 - Sharp v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2004

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
December 2014
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Idaho v. Wright · 503 So. 2d 803 - Wetz v. State · 430 So. 2d 832 - Read v. State · United States v. Morris · 666 So. 2d 767 - Cole v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “where the issue is raised on appeal but the matter cannot be resolved without additional fact-finding, the proper course for the appellate court is to deny relief without prejudice to the defendant to raise the same issues anew in a post-conviction relief proceeding where, if appropriate, the trial court can conduct a full evidentiary hearing.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.