Boykins v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
December 2008
most recently cited
10 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 862 So. 2d 587 - Ex Parte Boykins · 628 So. 2d 1075 - Cox v. State · 859 So. 2d 449 - Pinkard v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"to address the question whether the Court of Criminal Appeals properly affirmed the trial court's order of dismissal where the basis of the dismissal was the trial court's treatment of Boykins's petition for a writ of certiorari as a petition for a writ of habeas corpus."”
8 later decisions quote this exact passage“"[S]hould an appeal be taken from the Montgomery Circuit Court's judgment, the appeal should be filed with the Court of Civil Appeals, because Boykins's case would be an appeal from an administrative agency, see § 12-3-10 , Ala. Code 1975, rather than an appeal from a postconviction writ in a criminal case."”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“"[S]hould an appeal be taken from the Montgomery Circuit Court's judgment, the appeal should be filed with the Court of Civil Appeals, because Boykins's case would be an appeal from an administrative agency, see § 12-3-10, Ala.Code 1975, rather than an appeal from a post-conviction writ in a criminal case."”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.