Marin v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
December 1994
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Marin v. State · Roney v. State · Hamel v. State · Henry v. State · Moore v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he trial judge was under no obligation to appoint more than one counsel, and the fact that he afforded the appellant the assistance of additional counsel under the circumstances here described should not call for reversal merely because such written waiver was not signed by the appellant and his additional counsel before trial. Süch was not the legislative intent of Article 26.04 [the predecessor of article 1.051(e).]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Marin v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.