862 S.W.2d 348
Decided August 3, 1993
Missouri Court of Appeals · decided 1993-08-03
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1993-08-03
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently December 2011
2 federal appellate · 12 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1ORDER
¶2Husband appeals from that portion of the dissolution decree which divided his pension plan and annuity plan equally between the parties. We affirm. The judgment of the trial court is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).