Maddux v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
24
cited by 24 later decisions
1
states following
April 2008
most recently cited
24 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Batson v. Kentucky · Miller v. California · Kashif v. United States · Kissinger v. Halperin · Colley v. National Bank of Texas
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“... [W]e reject the State's argument that these contentions should be denied because the appellant is unable to prove "harm" by showing his peremptory challenges were exhausted or that he had to accept an objectionable juror.... [T]he harm in preventing answers to any proper question is the inability to intelligently make use of the peremptory challenges.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. Janecka v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.