Morrow v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 24 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently January 2014 · most notably Ortiz v. State (2002), Ortiz v. Quarterman (2007)
1 federal appellate · 24 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Almanza v. State · Benson v. State · Vernon v. State · Doyle v. State · Jones v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“intentionally or knowingly harms or threatens to harm another by an unlawful act in retaliation for or on account of the service of another as public servant, witness, prospective witness, or informant.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. In Re BPH · Cada v. State“one who has testified in an official proceeding.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“Where statutory terms are not defined by the legislature, we ascribe to those terms their ordinary meaning.” Morrow v. State, 862 S.W.2d 612, 614 (Tex.Crim.App.1993). 5 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.