Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 862 S.W.2d 657 - Pope v. St. John

Pope v. St. John’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
July 1996
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Malooly Brothers, Inc. v. Napier · Otis Engineering Corp. v. Clark · Fort Bend County Drainage District v. Sbrusch · Bennett v. Span Industries, Inc. · Dougherty v. Gifford

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “... Irrespective of any contract relationship between St. John and Pope, the law imposed upon St. John a duty to act with ordinary care toward Pope if the circumstances were such that a reasonably prudent person in St. John’s position would recognize that his acts, unless done with ordinary care, would place Pope in danger. [[Image here]] By undertaking affirmatively to identify Pope’s ailment based on the information supplied by Suarez, St. John assumed a legal duty to act with ordinary care in arriving at his identification and his consequent determination of whether he was qualified to treat the ailment.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.