Pope v. St. John’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
July 1996
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Malooly Brothers, Inc. v. Napier · Otis Engineering Corp. v. Clark · Fort Bend County Drainage District v. Sbrusch · Bennett v. Span Industries, Inc. · Dougherty v. Gifford
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“... Irrespective of any contract relationship between St. John and Pope, the law imposed upon St. John a duty to act with ordinary care toward Pope if the circumstances were such that a reasonably prudent person in St. John’s position would recognize that his acts, unless done with ordinary care, would place Pope in danger. [[Image here]] By undertaking affirmatively to identify Pope’s ailment based on the information supplied by Suarez, St. John assumed a legal duty to act with ordinary care in arriving at his identification and his consequent determination of whether he was qualified to treat the ailment.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. St. John v. Pope
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.