Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 863 F.2d 1210 - Netto v. Amtrak (National Railroad Passenger Corp.)

Netto v. Amtrak (National Railroad Passenger Corp.)’s Empirical Analysis

863 F.2d 1210 · 1989

Citation profile

83
cited by 83 later decisions
5
states following
April 2013
most recently cited

45 federal appellate · 3 district · 8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 83 later decisions — most recently April 2013 · most notably Skotak v. Tenneco Resins, Inc. (1992), International Shortstop, Inc. v. Rally's, Inc. (1991)

45 federal appellate · 3 district · 8 state decisions

6701989199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 45 U.S.C. § 51 (Federal Employers' Liability Act)

Relies on Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Urie v. Thompson · Gregory Lumber Co. v. United States · Federal Energy Regulatory Commission v. Martin Exploration Management Co. · Atchison Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company v. Buell

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 83 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “an attempt to leave the door to recovery for wholly emotional injury somewhat ajar but not by any means wide open.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “appears to invite the lower courts to parse the FELA in light of the specific facts of later cases,”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.